Humans are Turing complete

March 19, 2021

I want to propose an idea that’s so obvious that I think almost everyone misses its implications:

Humans are Turing-complete

What is Turing-complete?

The concept, derived from the conceptual Turing machine, as described by Wikipedia:

[A] system of data-manipulation rules is said to be Turing-complete or computationally universal if it can be used to simulate any Turing machine.

We use this concept when describing programming languages, as a sort of litmus test for their completeness. Somewhat famously, CSS is Turing-complete, which I guess angers some people, but I digress…

The point I want to make about humans being Turing complete is this:

Any task we can automate can be performed by a human (albeit, generally more slowly). This is probably pretty obvious, but has some interesting implications, like the idea that we can do Continuous Deployment without any automated tests.


Related Content

Better code review

How can we encourage less superficial code reviews?

How can I eliminate technical debt?

You can't eliminate technical debt. Nor should you want to. But where does that leaev us?

Types of technical debt

Where does technical debt come from? Three main sources.